Full Rank Report
Export every keyword and every grid point into one document for clients or the record.
A full rank report exports every tracked keyword and every grid point into a single document, giving clients the complete data behind a visibility claim rather than a selected screenshot.
What it does
Grid data persuades precisely because it is granular, and that granularity is exactly what makes it hard to share. Screenshotting individual scans loses the comparison that made the point, and pasting a table of positions loses the geography that made it credible.
This becomes a problem at review meetings, which is where the persuading needs to happen. An agency that has genuinely improved a client’s visibility across a service area frequently cannot demonstrate it convincingly, because the evidence lives in a tool the client does not open and cannot be summarised without losing what mattered.
A full export puts every keyword and every grid point into one document. Not a summary of the data, the data — with the visuals intact, ordered so it can be read, and branded as yours. It is what clients want at review time and what you want on file when someone disputes progress six months later.
It is deliberately complete rather than selective. Exporting only the keywords that improved destroys credibility the moment anyone notices, and someone always does. The full picture, with commentary explaining the mixed results, is more persuasive than a curated one.
Everything Full Rank Report gives you
Complete keyword export
Every tracked keyword included rather than a selected subset.
Every grid point included
Full per-point data behind each heat map, not just the summary position.
Embedded grid visuals
Heat maps included in the document, since the visual is what communicates.
Period comparison
Before and after grids side by side, which is the most persuasive artefact available.
Multi-location coverage
Every location in one export where a client has several.
White-label branding
Your logo and colours throughout, with no platform branding.
PDF and data formats
PDF for sending, structured data where deeper analysis is wanted.
Commentary sections
Space to explain what the data shows rather than leaving it to be interpreted.
Archival record
A permanent record of what visibility looked like on a given date.
From setup to first result
- 1
Choose locations and keywords
Include everything tracked. Selective export is where credibility gets lost.
- 2
Set the period
Include a comparison date so movement is visible rather than only the current state.
- 3
Generate the export
Grids, per-point data and summary assembled into one document.
- 4
Add commentary
Explain the mixed results. Data with no interpretation invites the wrong conclusion.
- 5
Send or archive
Share at the review meeting and keep the file as the record for that date.
- 6
Keep the series
Consecutive exports become the evidence base for the whole engagement.
- 7
Reference it in disputes
A dated, complete export settles most arguments about whether progress happened.
What changes with Full Rank Report
- Exporting only improved keywords
- Sending raw data with no summary
- Omitting the comparison period
- Not keeping past exports
- Sending it without discussion
- Granularity is what persuades
- Screenshots lose the comparison
- Clients want the full picture
- A dated record settles disputes
- Visuals communicate faster than tables
Granularity is what persuades
Grid data convinces because it is detailed, and summarising it removes the reason it worked.
Screenshots lose the comparison
Individual images cannot show movement, which is the thing you were trying to demonstrate.
Clients want the full picture
Selective exports are noticed, and the moment they are, everything else is doubted.
A dated record settles disputes
Six months later, a complete export answers “did anything actually improve?” definitively.
Visuals communicate faster than tables
A heat map comparison lands immediately where a position table requires study.
Commentary prevents misreading
Complete data with mixed results needs explaining, or the reader draws their own and usually wrong conclusion.
What it measures
- Keywords included per export
- Grid points captured
- Locations covered
- Period comparison span
- Export frequency
- Movement per keyword
What you get out of it
Evidence clients accept
Complete, dated, visual.
Movement made obvious
Before and after grids side by side.
Credibility preserved
Nothing selectively omitted.
A permanent record
Settles later disputes definitively.
Fully branded
Your document, not ours.
Ready for review meetings
Assembled rather than improvised.
What Full Rank Report produces
Every output is exportable and white-label, with your branding and none of ours.
Full PDF export
Every keyword, grid and visual.
Grid comparisons
Before and after heat maps.
Per-point data
The numbers behind each grid.
Keyword summary
Position and movement per term.
Multi-location sections
Each site covered separately.
Structured data file
For deeper analysis where wanted.
Who uses Full Rank Report
Send branded reports on a schedule and stop assembling decks by hand.
Give leadership the rollup and operators their own detail from one report.
Report per franchisee and across the network without duplicating work.
See plainly whether the last three months moved anything.
Get more out of it
- Export everything tracked. Selective exports are noticed and destroy credibility across the whole report.
- Always include a comparison date. A single grid shows state; two show progress.
- Add commentary explaining mixed results rather than leaving the client to interpret them.
- Keep every export. The series becomes the evidence base for the engagement.
- Lead with the visual comparison. Heat maps communicate in seconds what tables take minutes to convey.
- Use it at review meetings rather than sending it cold, since the commentary matters as much as the data.
Exporting only improved keywords
It is noticed, and once noticed every other figure you present is doubted.
Sending raw data with no summary
A complete export without commentary overwhelms rather than persuades.
Omitting the comparison period
A single grid shows where things stand, not that anything improved, which is what the client is asking.
Not keeping past exports
The series is the evidence. Without it, each report is an isolated claim rather than a documented trajectory.
Sending it without discussion
The document is most persuasive when someone walks through it, particularly where results are mixed.
Manually vs with Full Rank Report
| Doing it manually | With Full Rank Report |
|---|---|
| Screenshots of individual scans | Complete export with all grids |
| Selected keywords shown | Every tracked keyword included |
| No comparison to previous state | Before and after grids side by side |
| No archival record | Dated, permanent documentation |
| Platform branding on client files | Fully white-labelled |
| Tables of positions | Visual heat maps included |
- Include every tracked keyword
- Add a comparison date
- Generate with grid visuals embedded
- Write commentary on mixed results
- Brand it as yours
- Present rather than send cold
- Archive the file as the record
Full Rank Report is 1 of 42 tools you get
Every tool below is on the same plan at the same price. Nothing here is an add-on, an upgrade, or a separate subscription.
Rank & Visibility
Manage Profiles
Posts & Automation
Reviews & Reputation
Reports & White-Label
Others vs Local SEO Tool
How the usual pricing and packaging in this category compares with ours.
“Other tools” describes the common pattern across the category, not any one named product.
Full Rank Report is included on every plan
One flat price per location covers all 42 tools. There is no higher tier, no add-on, and no per-seat charge.
- All 42 tools on every plan
- No per-seat charges
- No setup fee and no contract
- Cancel or change locations any time
Full Rank Report questions
What is a full rank report?
A complete export of every tracked keyword and grid point into one branded document, including the heat map visuals.
What formats are available?
PDF for sharing, plus structured data export where further analysis is wanted.
Can it be white-labelled?
Yes, with your branding throughout and no platform branding anywhere.
Does it include grid visuals?
Yes. The heat maps are the reason grid data persuades, so summarising them out defeats the purpose.
Should I export only improved keywords?
No. Selective exports get noticed, and once noticed the whole report loses credibility.
Can I compare two dates?
Yes, and you should. A single grid shows state; two show whether anything actually improved.
How far back does data go?
As far as scanning has run, which is why running a baseline early matters more than it seems at the time.
Can it cover multiple locations?
Yes, with each location covered in its own section within one export.
Should I add commentary?
Yes. Complete data with mixed results needs explaining, or the reader interprets it themselves and usually incorrectly.
How often should I export?
Monthly or quarterly depending on the reporting cadence, and always before a review meeting.
Is it useful internally?
Yes, as an archival record. A dated export settles later disputes about whether progress occurred.
How large are the files?
They can be substantial with many keywords and locations, which is why summary sections sit at the front.
Can I include only some locations?
Yes, though within a location the keyword set should be complete.
Does it show competitor grids?
Competitor comparison lives in the competitor tools; this export focuses on your own visibility in full.
What makes it persuasive?
The before-and-after visual comparison. It communicates in seconds what a position table takes minutes to convey.
Should I send it or present it?
Present it where possible. The commentary matters as much as the data, particularly with mixed results.
Can clients get the raw data?
Yes, via the structured export, which some clients specifically want.
Does it replace the monthly report?
No. The monthly report summarises; this provides the complete underlying evidence.
What if results are mixed?
Report them honestly with commentary. Mixed results explained well build more trust than curated results do.
What is the single best use?
A quarterly review meeting, walking through the before-and-after grids with the full data attached.
Every tool. One price. No add-ons.
$5.33 per location per month gets you Full Rank Report and the other 41 tools.